New YorkerestThe essential reads from every New Yorker issue
Best of The New Yorker

Jeffrey Toobin

Jeffrey Toobin, the chief legal analyst for CNN, was a staff writer at The New Yorker from 1993 to 2020.

Read more on The New Yorker →

26 picks · 1993–2016

Featured Picks

Gawker’s Demise and the Trump-Era Threat to the First Amendment
annals of law · December 19, 2016

Hulk Hogan’s smashing legal victory shows us that publishing the truth may no longer be enough.

The Legacy of Lynching, on Death Row
profiles · August 22, 2016

Jeffrey Toobin on the lawyer, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, and author of “Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption.”

This Is My Jail
letter from baltimore · April 14, 2014

Where gang members and their female guards set the rules.

Adieu, Doma!
comment · July 8, 2013

The Supreme Court’s embrace of gay rights last week had an almost serene majesty. Yet the decision had its roots in something prosaic and largely …

Heavyweight
profiles · March 11, 2013

Jeffrey Toobin’s 2013 Profile of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The Professor
profiles · September 17, 2012

Jeffrey Toobin on the close Senate race in Massachusetts between the progressive Democrat and Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren and the incumbent Republican senator, Scott Brown.

Money Unlimited
annals of law · May 21, 2012

Jeffrey Toobin on how Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, dramatically changing campaign-finance laws.

Casualties of Justice
annals of law · January 3, 2011

The Justice Department clearly wronged Senator Ted Stevens. Did it also wrong one of his prosecutors?

After Stevens
profiles · March 22, 2010

What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader?

The Celebrity Defense
annals of law · December 14, 2009

Sex, fame, and the case of Roman Polanski.

Five to Four
comment · June 25, 2007

Comment about the conservative shift of the Supreme Court. As George W. Bush staggers toward the end of his second term, he can point to one major project …

Name That Source
annals of law · January 16, 2006

Why are the courts leaning on journalists?

Swing Shift
annals of law · September 12, 2005

Jeffrey Toobin’s 2005 piece on Justice Anthony Kennedy. Kennedy opposes racial preferences and argues for expansive Presidential powers, yet he wrote the two most important pro-gay-rights decisions in the Court’s history. One conservative called him “the most dangerous man in America.”

The Upstart
the political scene · May 16, 2005

Manhattan’s legendary D.A. faces a tough challenger.

The Driver
annals of law · June 10, 2002

Did the prosecutors in the Louima case have the right man all along?

Ashcroft’s Ascent
profiles · April 15, 2002

How far will the Attorney General go?

Women in Black
annals of law · October 30, 2000

ANNALS OF LAW about women judges and executions in Texas. . . Since 1976, Texas has executed two hundred and thirty-two people, which is more than a third …

The Secret War in Starr’s Office
a reporter at large · November 15, 1999

A REPORTER AT LARGE about the initial behind-the-scenes negotiations between Kenneth Starr’s prosecutors and Monica Lewinsky’s attorneys on her …

Terms of Impeachment
annals of law · September 14, 1998

ANNALS OF LAW about Washington's nascent impeachment drama. The writer describes the newly renovated suite H2-186, in the Gerald R. Ford House Office …

Humility and Justice
comment · April 1, 1996

Signed comment about the insanity defense... "Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes," Nick Carraway observes in "The Great Gatsby," …

Juries on Trial
annals of law · October 31, 1994

ANNALS OF LAW about jury trials, peremptory challenges, and two new books on juries; Jeffrey Abramson's "We, the Jury", and Stephen J. Adler's "The Jury.O …

An Incendiary Defense
annals of law · July 25, 1994

Jeffrey Toobin writes about the legal strategies in the O. J. Simpson trial.

Along Racial Lines
comment · April 4, 1994

Comment about Shaw v. Reno, a Supreme Court case about the 12th congressional district of North Carolina and a related trial. A great national experiment …

HE-E-ERE'S JUSTICE
comment · October 11, 1993

Comment about televising Supreme Court sessions. There are only so many ways to study the 8 Republicans and one Democrat who constitute the U.S. Supreme …

Two Years After the Anita Hill Hearings, Clarence Thomas Strikes Back
annals of law · September 27, 1993

The Supreme Court Justice is still fuming about his tumultuous confirmation, Jeffrey Toobin writes. In an unprecedented step, he is going public with his grievances—and lashing out in his votes.

Clearances
comment · February 15, 1993

Comment on the U.S. government's arbitrary denial of security clearances to prospective government employees who are gay. President Clinton has agreed …

Best OfLeaderboardAuthorsAbout
Back to latest issue

© 2026 New Yorkerest

Not affiliated with Condé Nast or The New Yorker Magazine. Made with respect and admiration for their exceptional editorial work.